Core i7-10870H vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-H
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
8 /16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
8.76k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
7.35k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
3.86k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
3.32k (x0.26)
TOTAL
59.55k
23.28k (x0.39)
Multithread
i7-10870H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
78.51k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
66.46k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
36.42k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
3.88k (x0.47)
TOTAL
375.77k
185.26k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
2601 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4442 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1125 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
183 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
8351 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3227 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2539 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
11910 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4