Core i7-10870H vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
18.86k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
10.06k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
4.14k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
3.24k (x0.23)
TOTAL
79.2k
36.31k (x0.46)
Multithread
i7-10870H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
218.93k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
139.75k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
55.47k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
12.42k (x1.47)
TOTAL
487.05k
426.58k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4