| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
13.1k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
11.91k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
4.83k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
3.83k (x0.3)
TOTAL
59.55k
33.68k (x0.57)

Multithread

i7-10870H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
105.42k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
109.99k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
44.56k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
17.7k (x2.15)
TOTAL
375.77k
277.66k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
20.99k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
11.9k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
4.72k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
3.75k (x0.26)
TOTAL
79.2k
41.36k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-10870H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
172.62k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
110.03k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
44.06k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
16.93k (x2)
TOTAL
487.05k
343.64k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4