| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-8700k


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8700k is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-8700k gets 443.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-8700k. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
80.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
443.77k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.13k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
16.96k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
5.56k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
12.85k (x0.92)
TOTAL
44.9k
39.5k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
24.01k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
108.69k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
36.62k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
9.33k (x1.11)
TOTAL
240.71k
178.64k (x0.74)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
12.92k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
20.68k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
5.3k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
12.59k (x0.91)
TOTAL
62.95k
51.48k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
94.26k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
152.55k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
39.74k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
8.53k (x1.02)
TOTAL
363.87k
295.07k (x0.81)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
16.87k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
26.12k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
6.33k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
13.71k (x1.08)
TOTAL
59.55k
63.03k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
105.74k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
180.52k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
44.99k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
8.51k (x1.03)
TOTAL
375.77k
339.77k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
31.2k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
27.82k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
6.57k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
15k (x1.04)
TOTAL
79.2k
80.6k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
202.42k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
186.33k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
44.96k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
10.05k (x1.19)
TOTAL
487.05k
443.77k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
1961 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
4671 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-8700k
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3192 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
17148 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4