Core i7-10870H vs i7-10700
Description
Both models i7-10870H and i7-10700 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0655
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
30.66k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
25.64k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.98k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
12.25k (x0.85)
TOTAL
79.2k
74.53k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
240.28k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
234.3k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
56.12k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
7.02k (x0.83)
TOTAL
487.05k
537.73k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4