Core i7-10870H vs i5-4690
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 3 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 3 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
22.97k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
13.02k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.21k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
4.74k (x0.33)
TOTAL
79.2k
45.95k (x0.58)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
85.98k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
49.01k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
19.5k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
9.46k (x1.12)
TOTAL
487.05k
163.95k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4