| | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i5-3470S


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3470S is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the i5-3470S gets 107.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 3.5 times faster than the i5-3470S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
Jun 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
16136
11860 (-26.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
24736
11531 (-53.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5984
4498 (-24.83%)
Test#1 (Memory)
12696
4696 (-63.01%)
TOTAL
59551
32585 (-45.28%)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
117028
42348 (-63.81%)
Test#2 (FP)
199876
41181 (-79.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50641
16139 (-68.13%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8229
8264 (0.43%)
TOTAL
375774
107932 (-71.28%)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
2601 points/W
652 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4442 points/W
634 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1125 points/W
248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
183 points/W
127 points/W
TOTAL
8351 points/W
1660 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
3227 points/GHz
3294 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/GHz
3203 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1249 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2539 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11910 points/GHz
9051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9