Core i7-10870H vs i5-3470S
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3470S is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the i5-3470S gets 93.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 4 times faster than the i5-3470S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the i5-3470S gets 93.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 4 times faster than the i5-3470S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
31.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
93.35k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
11.41k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
10.98k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
4.31k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
4.66k (x0.37)
TOTAL
59.55k
31.35k (x0.53)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
35.73k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
36k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
14.48k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
7.14k (x0.87)
TOTAL
375.77k
93.35k (x0.25)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
2601 points/W
550 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4442 points/W
554 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1125 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
183 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
8351 points/W
1436 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
3227 points/GHz
3168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/GHz
3050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2539 points/GHz
1293 points/GHz
TOTAL
11910 points/GHz
8708 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4