| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.4k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
20.25k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
11.69k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
11.66k (x0.83)
TOTAL
44.9k
48.01k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
38.93k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
191.89k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
108.8k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
14.95k (x1.79)
TOTAL
240.71k
354.57k (x1.47)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.22k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
25.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
12.66k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
11.66k (x0.84)
TOTAL
62.95k
64.74k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
155.37k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
260.27k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
115.37k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
20.04k (x2.39)
TOTAL
363.87k
551.04k (x1.51)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
17.25k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.53k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
12.56k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
11.4k (x0.9)
TOTAL
59.55k
66.74k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
144.5k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
243.41k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
109.02k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
16k (x1.94)
TOTAL
375.77k
512.94k (x1.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
30.84k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.38k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
12.66k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
11.74k (x0.82)
TOTAL
79.2k
81.62k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
294.86k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
280.92k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
113.9k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
20.16k (x2.38)
TOTAL
487.05k
709.85k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4