| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a70f41
Core
Comet Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
32.74k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
27.35k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
14.23k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
27.41k (x1.91)
TOTAL
79.2k
101.73k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-10870H

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
236.69k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
202.63k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
102.8k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
11.28k (x1.33)
TOTAL
487.05k
553.41k (x1.14)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4