Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 4750GE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 4750GE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
469.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
16.95k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.26k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
9.4k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
8.38k (x0.58)
TOTAL
79.2k
60.99k (x0.77)
Multithread
i7-10870H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
159.87k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
215.44k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
88.45k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
5.9k (x0.7)
TOTAL
487.05k
469.67k (x0.96)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
13419 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4