Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a40f41
Core
Comet Lake-H
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
21.04k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
22.41k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
10.21k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
24.27k (x1.69)
TOTAL
79.2k
77.93k (x0.98)
Multithread
i7-10870H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
158.65k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
215.86k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
89.45k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
14.77k (x1.74)
TOTAL
487.05k
478.73k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4