| | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 4800H gets 451.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4094 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30376
16494 (-45.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
27947
23376 (-16.36%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6510
9558 (46.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
14366
7525 (-47.62%)
TOTAL
79200
56953 (-28.09%)

Multithread

i7-10870H

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
216184
158852 (-26.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
210824
201470 (-4.44%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51574
86816 (68.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8465
4447 (-47.47%)
TOTAL
487048
451585 (-7.28%)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3530 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
4477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
10035 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2276 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1792 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
13560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9