Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
17.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
27.38k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
9.35k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
23.9k (x1.66)
TOTAL
79.2k
78.2k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
176.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
219.88k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
100k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
12.93k (x1.53)
TOTAL
487.05k
508.89k (x1.04)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4