Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
16.77k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.29k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
8.79k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
22.51k (x1.57)
TOTAL
79.2k
74.35k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
167.94k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
209.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
94.41k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
11.27k (x1.33)
TOTAL
487.05k
483.47k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4