Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.25k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
19.72k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
5.84k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
21.36k (x1.52)
TOTAL
44.9k
51.17k (x1.14)
Multithread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
35.04k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
181.42k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
64.86k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
8.21k (x0.98)
TOTAL
240.71k
289.54k (x1.2)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.22k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
24.12k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
5.87k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
21k (x1.52)
TOTAL
62.95k
66.21k (x1.05)
Multithread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
126.81k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
229.86k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
61.74k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
9.77k (x1.16)
TOTAL
363.87k
428.19k (x1.18)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
14.44k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
24.92k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.8k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
19.07k (x1.5)
TOTAL
59.55k
64.24k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
122.01k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
220.34k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
59.89k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
9.9k (x1.2)
TOTAL
375.77k
412.13k (x1.1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
15.34k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
25.75k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.79k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
17.95k (x1.25)
TOTAL
79.2k
64.83k (x0.82)
Multithread
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
123.07k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
239.3k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
60.6k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
8.18k (x0.97)
TOTAL
487.05k
431.14k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4