| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
12.5k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
22.92k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.45k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
14.72k (x1.16)
TOTAL
59.55k
55.59k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-10870H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
92.51k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
144.76k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
54.43k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
22.08k (x2.68)
TOTAL
375.77k
313.78k (x0.84)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
13.72k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
22.48k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.12k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
15.44k (x1.07)
TOTAL
79.2k
56.76k (x0.72)

Multithread

i7-10870H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
110.92k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
200.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
54.24k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
7.01k (x0.83)
TOTAL
487.05k
372.73k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4