Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.2k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
17.36k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
7.5k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
23.79k (x1.7)
TOTAL
44.9k
52.85k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
22.11k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
108.04k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
56.81k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
36.39k (x4.35)
TOTAL
240.71k
223.36k (x0.93)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.38k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
21.94k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
7.97k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
24.76k (x1.79)
TOTAL
62.95k
70.05k (x1.11)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
96.91k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
135.12k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
70.39k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
56.43k (x6.73)
TOTAL
363.87k
358.85k (x0.99)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
15.04k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
20.95k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
8.57k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
21.71k (x1.71)
TOTAL
59.55k
66.27k (x1.11)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
94.36k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
141.73k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
69.38k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
32.72k (x3.98)
TOTAL
375.77k
338.19k (x0.9)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
16.04k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
24.47k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
8.38k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
21.66k (x1.51)
TOTAL
79.2k
70.55k (x0.89)
Multithread
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
113.63k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
143.55k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
63.84k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
27.34k (x3.23)
TOTAL
487.05k
348.35k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4