| | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 2600 gets 305.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.6 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
30376
14495 (-52.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
27947
23944 (-14.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6510
5368 (-17.54%)
Test#1 (Memory)
14366
16929 (17.84%)
TOTAL
79200
60736 (-23.31%)

Multithread

i7-10870H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
216184
87208 (-59.66%)
Test#2 (FP)
210824
169162 (-19.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51574
43104 (-16.42%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8465
6443 (-23.89%)
TOTAL
487048
305916 (-37.19%)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2602 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
663 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
4706 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3717 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
6139 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
4341 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
15573 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9