| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
b0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
53.69k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
28.76k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
14.93k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
15.47k (x1.08)
TOTAL
79.2k
112.85k (x1.42)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
526.44k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
420.48k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
196.13k (x3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
17.68k (x2.09)
TOTAL
487.05k
1160.72k (x2.38)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4