| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i3-13100F


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
b06f5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
47.14k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
25.77k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
13.25k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
14.77k (x1.03)
TOTAL
79.2k
100.94k (x1.27)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
168.51k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
142.8k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
63.57k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
15.34k (x1.81)
TOTAL
487.05k
390.23k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4