Core i7-10870H vs i5-12400F
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
90672
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
37.79k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
24.07k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
12.44k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
13.71k (x0.95)
TOTAL
79.2k
88.01k (x1.11)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
212.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
197.81k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
84.35k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
17.48k (x2.06)
TOTAL
487.05k
512.23k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4