| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i3-12100T


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
90675
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
6.88k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
17.36k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
12.26k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
13.49k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.9k
49.98k (x1.11)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
22.03k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
84.16k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
46.49k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
8.96k (x1.07)
TOTAL
240.71k
161.65k (x0.67)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
22.39k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
22.29k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
13.37k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
13.72k (x0.99)
TOTAL
62.95k
71.76k (x1.14)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
76.69k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
104.06k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
53.2k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
8.86k (x1.06)
TOTAL
363.87k
242.81k (x0.67)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
22.25k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
23.16k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
13.09k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
13.21k (x1.04)
TOTAL
59.55k
71.7k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
77.43k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
109.08k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
52.45k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
8.75k (x1.06)
TOTAL
375.77k
247.71k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
43.24k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
23.76k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
12.67k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
13.88k (x0.97)
TOTAL
79.2k
93.54k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
150.28k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
126.29k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
45.32k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
8.73k (x1.03)
TOTAL
487.05k
330.62k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4