| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i9-11900KB


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
537.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
24.09k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
19.54k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
8.48k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
11.68k (x0.81)
TOTAL
79.2k
63.79k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
220.79k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
225.98k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
79.1k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
11.32k (x1.34)
TOTAL
487.05k
537.18k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
8264 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4