| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i5-11400T


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 240.7 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 3.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
3.51k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
14.2k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
7.63k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
6.06k (x0.43)
TOTAL
44.9k
31.39k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
7.4k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
31.37k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
18.11k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
10.23k (x1.22)
TOTAL
240.71k
67.1k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
694 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1114 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
186 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
5349 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3961 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2807 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
8980 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4