| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
50657
Core
Comet Lake-H
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
2.59k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
9.5k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.15k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
5.9k (x0.42)
TOTAL
43.19k
21.13k (x0.49)

Multithread

i7-10750H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
21.09k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
80.93k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
30.76k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.51k (x1.61)
TOTAL
137.58k
141.3k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
16.86k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
12.08k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
3.37k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
6.29k (x0.45)
TOTAL
75.67k
38.61k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-10750H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
150.99k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
118.54k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
33.44k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
8.6k (x1.24)
TOTAL
349.21k
311.57k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4