| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
13.1k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
11.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
4.83k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
3.83k (x0.29)
TOTAL
61.43k
33.68k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
105.42k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
109.99k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
44.56k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
17.7k (x3.34)
TOTAL
212.53k
277.66k (x1.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
20.99k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
11.9k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.72k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
3.75k (x0.27)
TOTAL
75.67k
41.36k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
172.62k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
110.03k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
44.06k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
16.93k (x2.44)
TOTAL
349.21k
343.64k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4