| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-6560U


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.3 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
406e3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
107.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.29k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
13.52k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.24k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
7.08k (x0.51)
TOTAL
43.19k
28.14k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
6.49k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
31.11k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
10.25k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
6.16k (x1.17)
TOTAL
137.58k
54.01k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
22.21k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
19.25k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.41k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
7.09k (x0.51)
TOTAL
75.67k
52.96k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
44.94k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
44.98k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
10.83k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.26k (x0.9)
TOTAL
349.21k
107.01k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4