| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i5-9500


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.45k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
18.43k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
12.63k (x0.91)
TOTAL
43.19k
41.34k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
24.75k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
103.1k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
32.43k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
5.56k (x1.06)
TOTAL
137.58k
165.85k (x1.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
16.06k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
23.19k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
6.1k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
12.79k (x0.93)
TOTAL
60.87k
58.14k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
90.44k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
131.23k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
33.85k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.59k (x1.1)
TOTAL
207.14k
261.11k (x1.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
16.14k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
24.18k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.5k (x0.95)
TOTAL
61.43k
58.69k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
92.21k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
137.92k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
33.12k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
5.56k (x1.05)
TOTAL
212.53k
268.8k (x1.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
29.17k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
25.49k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.84k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
13.15k (x0.95)
TOTAL
75.67k
73.65k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
166.66k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
146.9k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
34.04k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
5.25k (x0.76)
TOTAL
349.21k
352.84k (x1.01)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4