Core i7-10750H vs i5-4590
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-4590 gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-4590 gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
41.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
144.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
21.17k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
11.52k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.75k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
4.32k (x0.31)
TOTAL
75.67k
41.76k (x0.55)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
77.73k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
42.15k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
17.41k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
7.47k (x1.08)
TOTAL
349.21k
144.76k (x0.41)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
925 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
502 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
1723 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5723 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
3112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1284 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1168 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4