Core i7-10750H vs i5-10400F
Description
Both models i7-10750H and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0655
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
28.39k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
24.89k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.78k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
13.19k (x0.95)
TOTAL
75.67k
72.25k (x0.95)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
180.2k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
163.51k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
40.6k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
349.21k
390.78k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4