| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i3-2330M


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i3-2330M gets 33.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 6.4 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-H
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
16.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
33.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
5.61k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
5.42k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
2.45k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
2.53k (x0.19)
TOTAL
61.43k
16.02k (x0.26)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
11.99k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
11.42k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
5.8k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
4.07k (x0.77)
TOTAL
212.53k
33.28k (x0.16)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
1502 points/W
343 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2487 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4723 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5091 points/GHz
2465 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2639 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
12285 points/GHz
7281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4