Core i7-10750H vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.2 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.2 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906c0
Core
Comet Lake-H
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
9.83k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
9.74k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
3.65k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
3.88k (x0.28)
TOTAL
60.87k
27.1k (x0.45)
Multithread
i7-10750H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
25.04k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
24.7k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
9.29k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.06k (x1)
TOTAL
207.14k
64.09k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1490 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2399 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
601 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
4603 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3325 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4834 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2738 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
12174 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4