| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i5-13400


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
b06f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
47.01k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.73k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
14.28k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
12.1k (x0.87)
TOTAL
75.67k
100.11k (x1.32)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
228.2k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
160.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
71.12k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
38.23k (x5.52)
TOTAL
349.21k
497.83k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4