| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-1280P


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
468.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
6.94k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
18.46k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
11.27k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
13.6k (x0.97)
TOTAL
43.19k
50.27k (x1.16)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
44.01k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
125.05k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
76.28k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
15.52k (x2.94)
TOTAL
137.58k
260.85k (x1.9)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
22.72k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
23.88k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
12.75k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
13.71k (x1)
TOTAL
60.87k
73.05k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
151.95k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
160.95k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
84.9k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
15.91k (x3.14)
TOTAL
207.14k
413.72k (x2)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
22.76k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
25.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
12.64k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
13.33k (x1.01)
TOTAL
61.43k
73.92k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
149.83k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
170.43k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
83.32k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
15.67k (x2.96)
TOTAL
212.53k
419.25k (x1.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
39.78k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.06k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
12.44k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
13.17k (x0.95)
TOTAL
75.67k
91.45k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
209.96k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
170.21k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
72.04k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
16.09k (x2.32)
TOTAL
349.21k
468.3k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4