Core i7-10750H vs i5-12400F
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
90675
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
7.43k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
18.64k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
13.15k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
14.82k (x1.06)
TOTAL
43.19k
54.04k (x1.25)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
36.23k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
134.76k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
84.06k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
16.71k (x3.17)
TOTAL
137.58k
271.76k (x1.98)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
24.18k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
23.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
14.42k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
14.87k (x1.09)
TOTAL
60.87k
77.32k (x1.27)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
122.98k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
168.77k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
96.11k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
16.32k (x3.22)
TOTAL
207.14k
404.19k (x1.95)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
24.24k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
24.74k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
13.95k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
14.47k (x1.1)
TOTAL
61.43k
77.41k (x1.26)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
126.87k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
186.48k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
92.37k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
15.45k (x2.91)
TOTAL
212.53k
421.18k (x1.98)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
33.85k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
20.33k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
10.51k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
11.77k (x0.85)
TOTAL
75.67k
76.46k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
174.21k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
141.31k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
64.86k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
19.01k (x2.74)
TOTAL
349.21k
399.39k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4