Core i7-10750H vs i5-1235U
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
297.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
7.33k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
18.27k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
12.8k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
13.2k (x0.95)
TOTAL
43.19k
51.61k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
29.24k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
83.32k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
54.53k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.99k (x0.95)
TOTAL
137.58k
172.07k (x1.25)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
23.53k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
23.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
14.71k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
13.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
60.87k
74.99k (x1.23)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
106.07k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
115.88k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
60.53k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.88k (x1.16)
TOTAL
207.14k
288.36k (x1.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
23.03k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
24.11k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
13.9k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.11k (x0.92)
TOTAL
61.43k
73.15k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
111.78k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
124.18k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
59.87k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
5.76k (x1.09)
TOTAL
212.53k
301.58k (x1.42)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
36.73k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
22.09k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
11.24k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
11.58k (x0.83)
TOTAL
75.67k
81.64k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
130.18k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
110.21k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
50.76k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.31k (x0.91)
TOTAL
349.21k
297.46k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4