Core i7-10750H vs i7-11800H
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
607.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
33.02k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
11.72k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
17.06k (x1.23)
TOTAL
75.67k
88.34k (x1.17)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
260.97k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
248.94k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
86.55k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
10.91k (x1.58)
TOTAL
349.21k
607.38k (x1.74)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
13497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4