Core i7-10700 vs Xeon W-2223
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
25.09k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
20.76k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.07k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
8.76k (x0.71)
TOTAL
74.53k
59.68k (x0.8)
Multithread
i7-10700
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
111.43k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
100.2k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
24.67k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
6.89k (x0.98)
TOTAL
537.73k
243.18k (x0.45)
Performance/W
i7-10700
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4