Core i7-10700 vs i7-10870H
Description
Both models i7-10700 and i7-10870H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
30.38k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
27.95k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
6.51k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
14.37k (x1.17)
TOTAL
74.53k
79.2k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-10700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
216.18k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
210.82k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
51.57k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
8.47k (x1.21)
TOTAL
537.73k
487.05k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4