Core i7-10700 vs i3-10105
Description
Both models i7-10700 and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
28.9k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
25.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.88k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
8.29k (x0.68)
TOTAL
74.53k
68.92k (x0.92)
Multithread
i7-10700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
111.69k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
110.23k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
28.45k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
3.56k (x0.51)
TOTAL
537.73k
253.93k (x0.47)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4