Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a70f41
Core
Comet Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
32.74k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
27.35k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
14.23k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
27.41k (x2.24)
TOTAL
74.53k
101.73k (x1.36)
Multithread
i7-10700
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
236.69k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
202.63k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
102.8k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
11.28k (x1.61)
TOTAL
537.73k
553.41k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i7-10700
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4