Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 7 5800U
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.7 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
314.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
18.34k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
22.78k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
9.45k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
20.59k (x1.68)
TOTAL
74.53k
71.16k (x0.95)
Multithread
i7-10700
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
102.74k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
143.27k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
58.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
10.41k (x1.48)
TOTAL
537.73k
314.55k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i7-10700
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
20970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4