Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.6 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.6 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
15.75k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
26.29k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.91k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
18.48k (x1.51)
TOTAL
74.53k
66.44k (x0.89)
Multithread
i7-10700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
94.49k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
182.53k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
45.95k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
10.15k (x1.44)
TOTAL
537.73k
333.12k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i7-10700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4