| | | | | | |

Core i7-10700 vs i5-13400


Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
b06f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
47.01k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
26.73k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
14.28k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
12.1k (x0.99)
TOTAL
74.53k
100.11k (x1.34)

Multithread

i7-10700

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
228.2k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
160.28k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
71.12k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
38.23k (x5.44)
TOTAL
537.73k
497.83k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i7-10700
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4