Core i7-10700 vs i3-13100F
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
b06f5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
47.14k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
25.77k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
13.25k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
14.77k (x1.21)
TOTAL
74.53k
100.94k (x1.35)
Multithread
i7-10700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
168.51k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
142.8k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
63.57k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
15.34k (x2.18)
TOTAL
537.73k
390.23k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4