Core i7-10700 vs i9-11900KB
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i9-11900KB. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i9-11900KB. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
806d1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
24.09k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
19.54k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
8.48k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
11.68k (x0.95)
TOTAL
74.53k
63.79k (x0.86)
Multithread
i7-10700
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
220.79k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
225.98k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
79.1k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
11.32k (x1.61)
TOTAL
537.73k
537.18k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4