Core i7-10700 vs i9-11900H
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
806d1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
33.38k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
27.12k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
11.69k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
17k (x1.39)
TOTAL
74.53k
89.19k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-10700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
249.83k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
237.26k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
84.18k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
13.2k (x1.88)
TOTAL
537.73k
584.47k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4