Core i7-10700 vs i7-11700F
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
32.55k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
26.95k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
10.76k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
19.32k (x1.58)
TOTAL
74.53k
89.58k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-10700
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
232.06k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
203.56k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
72.89k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
3.81k (x0.54)
TOTAL
537.73k
512.32k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4