Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-7820HQ
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
906e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
23.23k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
20.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.57k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
7.92k (x0.56)
TOTAL
74.82k
55.85k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
85.54k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
87.07k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
20.37k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.57k (x0.41)
TOTAL
214.34k
196.55k (x0.92)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4