Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.5 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.5 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
756.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
16.73k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
24.74k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
8.82k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
22.22k (x1.57)
TOTAL
74.82k
72.51k (x0.97)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
248.24k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
309.66k (x3.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
140.01k (x4.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
58.39k (x6.68)
TOTAL
214.34k
756.3k (x3.53)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4